1  |  2  |  3 

June 28, 2013

Gay Pennsylvania state Rep barred from discussing marriage equality

Apparently mentioning gay marriage at all is a violation of God's Law. His secret law that only exists in the minds of homophobes, that is. Pennsylvania Dem silenced by opponent citing 'God's law' - The Maddow Blog
As is the case in many states, many in Pennsylvania are considering how to proceed in the wake of the Supreme Court's ruling striking down the Defense of Marriage Act, and on Wednesday, state Rep. Brian Sims (D) of Philadelphia rose to address the issue with his legislative colleagues. But Sims, the first openly gay member elected to the state House, was not allowed to deliver his remarks -- one of his colleagues raised a procedural objection to block him from speaking. And why is that? Republican State Rep. Daryl Metcalfe, who prevented Sims from addressing the chamber on DOMA, explained himself this way: "I did not believe that as a member of that body that I should allow someone to make comments such as he was preparing to make that ultimately were just open rebellion against what the word of God has said, what God has said, and just open rebellion against God's law," said Metcalfe, R-Butler. Maybe now would be a good time to note that the separation of church and state still exists; American policymakers' ability to discuss Supreme Court rulings should not be based on one person's interpretation of "God's law"; and theocracies, as a rule, are not a good idea.

August 19, 2009

Barack Obama: Bad president

He does seem to lack the killer instinct. David Michael Green: Ladies and Gentlemen, Barack Obama... Giving Us the Worst of All Worlds
Both President Obama’s health care plan and his presidency are going down the toilet. This is well, and right, and just as it should be. Obama is turning out to be a disastrous president, wholly unsuited for the times and our national and global challenges, and his job approval ratings reflect this. In Obama, we get all the corporate toadying of the last Democratic president, along with an even greater unwillingness than Clinton – and who would’ve thought that was possible – to name names, call out enemies, and throw a freakin’ punch every other year or so. (We’re also getting a continuation of the civil rights and civil liberties policies of Dick Cheney, as an extra added bonus, but that’s another story.) What makes it even more astonishing this time around, however, is that we’ve seen this movie before, and we know how it ends. There is apparently absolutely no bottom – as the events of recent weeks have reconfirmed – to the pit of vicious lies, brutal tactics, and democracy-demolishing antics of which regressives will avail themselves in their practice of contemporary American politics. In addition to not being prepared for that, Barack Obama is still seemingly unable to raise his voice a decibel or two against the very people who are helping him to destroy his own presidency. Indeed, he is negotiating ‘bipartisan’ (read: total capitulation) deals with them, even as they relentlessly trash him before a national audience.

March 05, 2008

FORGET NAFTA, LOOK AT WHAT CLINTON, OBAMA SAY ON CHINA TRADE

The Nation | FORGET NAFTA, LOOK AT WHAT CLINTON, OBAMA...

August 03, 2007

Court rules FBI violated Constitution by raiding congressman's office

Court: FBI Violated Constitution in Raid

The FBI violated the Constitution when agents raided U.S. Rep. William Jefferson's office last year and viewed legislative documents in a corruption investigation, a federal appeals court ruled Friday.

The court ordered the Justice Department to return any legislative documents it seized from the Louisiana Democrat's office on Capitol Hill. The court did not order the return of all the documents seized in the raid and did not say whether prosecutors could use any of the records against Jefferson in their bribery case.

Jefferson argued that the first-of-its-kind raid trampled congressional independence. The Constitution prohibits the executive branch from using its law enforcement powers to interfere with the lawmaking process. The Justice Department said that declaring the search unconstitutional would essentially prohibit the FBI from ever looking at a lawmaker's documents.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit rejected that claim. The court held that, while the search itself was constitutional, FBI agents crossed the line when they viewed every record in the office without giving Jefferson the chance to argue that some documents involved legislative business.

May 18, 2007

How much federal dick will XM Satellite Radio suck?

via Portal of Evil | via Media Channel | LA...

March 28, 2007

Sorry, no podcast.

Early day tomorrow, need to unwind. Sorry. See ya Friday....

March 22, 2007

Poor Mojo's News Show Podcast No. 73 for Thursday, March 22, 2007

Poor Mojo's News Show Podcast No. 73 (64 kbps .mp3...

February 20, 2007

all up in yer MySpace - The Podcast

If you're on MySpace, check in and say hey, I'll...

February 09, 2007

Podcast added to podOmatic

Poor Mojo's News Show via pod0matic player...