1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9  |  10  |  11  |  12  |  13  |  14  |  15  |  16  |  17  |  18  |  19  |  20  |  21  |  22  |  23  |  24  |  25  |  26  |  27  |  28  |  29  |  30  |  31  |  32  |  33  |  34  |  35  |  36  |  37  |  38  |  39  |  40  |  41  |  42  |  43  |  44  |  45  |  46  |  47  |  48  |  49  |  50  |  51  |  52  |  53  |  54  |  55  |  56  |  57  |  58  |  59  |  60  |  61  |  62  |  63  |  64  |  65  |  66  |  67  |  68  |  69  |  70  |  71  |  72  |  73  |  74  |  75  |  76  |  77  |  78  |  79  |  80  |  81  |  82  |  83  |  84  |  85  |  86  |  87  |  88  |  89  |  90  |  91  |  92  |  93  |  94  |  95  |  96  |  97  |  98  |  99  |  100  |  101  |  102  |  103  |  104  |  105  |  106  |  107  |  108  |  109  |  110 

June 28, 2011

Darryl Cunningham explains evolution

You might remember Cunningham from a comic he did a while back that looked at the claims of homeopathists, or for the one he did about Dr. Andrew Wakefield's vaccine scares. This is better than those two. Darryl Cunningham Investigates: Evolution

June 27, 2011

Zac Gorman on how Legend of Zelda influenced him as a kid

This is lovely. Nice art: Zac Gorman--The Beat

June 23, 2011

This is easily the dumbest XKCD ever

I've been off XKCD for a while now. Something about it just rubs me the wrong way. Maybe it's the smarmy, facile arguments? Or the cutesy pixie dream girls? Or just how the strip feels like it's always grabbing the low-hanging fruit and high-fiving itself? In any case, this strip argues that there is no such thing as a difference in quality, and that any perceived difference in quality is just a function of fanaticism. Seriously. It's so mind-numbingly stupid that I want to scream. xkcd: Connoisseur

June 22, 2011

A sex worker reviews Chester Brown's PAYING FOR IT

This is an excellent companion piece to the Savage Critics roundtable on Brown's memoir/polemic. An Escort Reviews Chester Brown’s Paying for It | Tits and Sass
. . . From a social standpoint, Chester is the ideal john: he’s not married or in a committed relationship and he doesn’t excel socially. People who are largely against men hiring prostitutes will make cautious exceptions for just such individuals. “Well…,” they reason reluctantly, “if you’re incapable of getting laid any other way and you’re not betraying your significant other, I guess it’s okay.” Less socially acceptably, Chester occasionally seems detached to the point of amorality. He’s only mildly concerned about the possibility that one woman he see repeatedly is under 18, and is aroused by another escort’s apparent pain while he’s screwing her. He’s not categorically a bad guy—when a different escort tells him he needs to hurry up and come, he loses his erection and doesn’t get off, but still tips her. From my (escort) standpoint, he’s the type of john I religiously steer away from, and that’s largely due to his immersion in review board “culture.” It doesn’t take too long for Chester to start cataloging the physical attributes and sexual performance of every woman he sees in anticipation of going home and writing about it for other dudes. Even his non-prostitute seeing friend asks, don’t “prostitutes [...] expect a measure of privacy and discretion for their johns”? And his (temporary) regular tells him she doesn’t want to read the reviews because they’d make her uncomfortable, but Chester is not dissuaded. In the five years that I’ve been networking with other prostitutes, I’ve only ever met two who were enthusiastically in favor of reviews. At best, my acquaintances and friends have seen them as a necessary evil, a form of advertising they dislike but worry they can’t do without. Most women I’ve met hate them and sometimes forbid them outright, like I do. I get why some guys want to read Yelp-like write-ups before seeing someone, and I can understand why Chester wants to complain about it when he loses money on a disappointing experience. But his fickleness and shallowness rubbed me the wrong way. When one girl stays quiet and inert during sex, he decides he likes her honesty (because she isn’t pretending to enjoy it.) When a different girl gives him “the best blowjob of [his] life” but then stays still during penetrative sex, he doesn’t tip her and plans to disparage her in a review. Initially he hews to escorts ages 18-20, and when he complains about a girl’s legs being “a bit thick,” it invites some eye-rolling. (“Oh, the girl you’re paying $80 to fuck you doesn’t have the body of a photoshopped supermodel? Call consumer protection!”) . . .

June 15, 2011

The History of Green Lantern explained

Comics, Everybody: The History of Green Lantern Explained - ComicsAlliance | Comic book culture, news, humor, commentary, and reviews

June 08, 2011

Kate Beaton's Juarez and Maximilian

Hark, a vagrant: 309