« The Great New England Vampire Panic #longread | Main | "My Name is Joe Biden and I’ll Be Your Server Tonight" »

Judge rules that supporting equality is de facto an endorsement of hatred towards religion

This is in Russia, regarding the Pussy Riot verdict. Fascinating logic here. Basically, since Christianity is anti-feminist in that preaches female subservience, any statement of feminism or equality is a statement implicitly attacking Christianity.

Even though the Russian constitution considers men and women equal.

Against the Stream: Pussy Riot and "Orthodox Christianity"

For Pussy Riot, the "punk prayer" aimed to undo the identification between "normal Russian personhood," Putin's regime, and the Orthodox Church. The mutual constitution of a unified "Russian people" and a unified "Orthodox Christianity" reinforce the legitimacy of Putin's sovereignty along with that of his former KGB colleague Patriarch Kirill Gundyayev. On trial, then, was also the possibility of religious contestation—i.e. that one might be critical of a religious tradition and nonetheless speak for it rather than hatefully against it. As one blogger for Women in Theology notes, the language of Judge Marina Syrova's ruling pits Pussy Riot's feminist commitments against the "antifeminism" of Christianity. Judge Syrova explains that "The court does find a religious hatred motive in the actions of the defendants by way of them being feminists who consider men and women to be equal. Now gender equally [sic] is asserted, maintained by the Russian constitution [...] At the same time, Orthodox Christianity, and Catholic Christianity and other denominations do not agree with feminism and their own values are not in line with feminists."

Playing a theologian or a historian, the Judge publicly establishes a uniform "Orthodox Christianity," whose constitutive feature is an opposition to equality between men and women, so much so that any challenge to this inequality constitutes an act of hatred. (emphasis added)