« kottke.org best links of 2007 | Main | Three Watchmen scripts leaked and critiqued »

Links to Us: "Klown Kar Kapers," or, "Why I hate broads."

Q: How many radical feminists does it take to change a light bulb?
A: That's an old joke and it's not funny!!

So, now I'm a he-man woman hater.

I think it might be a worthwhile exercise to do some thinking on why it is that Michelle Duggar seems to be fair game for pretty much everyone, including for feminists. It’s open season on the woman– mock her, make fun of her hair, her appearance, her clothes, her body, her reproductive organs, other of her internal organs, her vagina, attack her, depict her as a pig, call her brainwashed.

vagina.jpg

And it's all thanks to my lambasting of Michelle Duggar and her 17 crotchfruit. Well, I just posted up the pig picture, blame sfgate.com's Mark Morford for the text.

And furthermore, who are you to suggest that her equally troubling husband -- whose name is, of course, Jim Bob and he's hankerin' to be a Republican senator and try not to wince in sociopolitical pain when you say that -- isn't more than a little numb to the real world, and that bringing 16 hungry mewling attention-deprived kids (and she wants more! Yay!) into this exhausted world zips right by "touching" and races right past "disturbing" and lurches its way, heaving and gasping and sweating from the karmic armpits, straight into "Oh my God, what the hell is wrong with you people?"

But that would be, you know, mean. Mean and callous to suggest that this might be the most disquieting photo you see all year, this bizarre Duggar family of 18 spotless white hyperreligious interchangeable people with alarmingly bad hair...

I know why I juxtaposed that sow picture with the Duggar article -- because I'm an asshole and I'm trying to make people laugh. And that's why Morford wrote his column. And that's why whomever made the demotivator above made it. Because we all need to laugh, and we often get laughs at other people's expense.

But there are rules, of a kind. For example, I wouldn't give a damn if Michelle Duggar had 27 kids if she did so quietly. There is a legal rule which stems from an Anglo-Saxon common-law concept of fairness. If you are a public figure, you have a diminished expectation of privacy. If you parade your family around to make a political point, people are gonna shit on you. Too bad.

Because she and her husband ARE exploiting their children and ARE profiting from being an all-American patriotic, fecund, fundamentalist freak-show, I get to call bullshit. Or pigshit.

Fritz wrote me regarding the following reader submission, which led to me learning that I'm on the short list of mysoginist bloggers (at least at Women's Space). And to mention that my original post pointing to Morford's rant gets hundreds of hits per month:

12/31/2007 | NYT | The Caucus | Romney to Huckabee Supporter: Pizza?

Mitt Romney stopped this afternoon at a pizza joint here to grab a slice for the road before heading on to his fifth campaign event of the day in Waterloo.

His campaign organized a brief news conference with members of the traveling press corps following Mr. Romney in a bus so he could comment on Mike Huckabee’s news conference and switcheroo decision not to air an ad attacking Mr. Romney but to still show it to reporters.

But after Mr. Romney delivered a statement, a former Arkansas state legislator, Jim Bob Duggar, and a Huckabee supporter materialized to confront Mr. Romney about the coverage of abortions under Massachusetts’ universal health care plan.

Why does anyone care what Jim Bob thinks about anything? Because he made a lot of babies in order to make a point. Waa waa waa, all you soi disant "feminist" bloggers concerned about Michelle Duggar's right to force her teen girl children into slavery taking care of a score of little brothers and sisters, cry me a fucking river and do something to stop these evil twits from eroding your reproductive rights.

The anonymous tip contained loads more Mike Huckabee bashing, of which I approve. Included is the allegation that the Duggars can support their obnoxiously large klan only through the patronage of evangelist Bill Gothard. I do want to mention that axes are being ground, here -- if you care to know more, read from the anonymous email we got after the jump and do your own math. Our official position on this is an ill-informed shrug.

I'm not worried, though, as Huckabee has as much chance of becoming president as I have of shitting out 17 flaxen-haired Stepford-tots.

Comments?

And, in for a penny, in for a pound: benfolds.org | Bitches Ain't Shit

Excerpt from the anonymous letter that launched this ungainly posting:

Are the Duggars financially independent?

Jim Duggar praises Jim Sammon's "Financial Freedom Seminar" for allegedly giving them financial independence to live off their investments: http://www.duggarfamily.com/financialfreedom.html

Sammon's program is operated by Gothard's IBLP: http://iblp.org/iblp/discipleship/financialfreedom/

Questions:

Is the 19-member Duggar family, in fact, financially subsidized by Gothard, IBLP as positive PR tool? How did they afford the family bus? How does Jim Bob find time to campaign for Huckabee?

Why not ask the Duggars if they receive financial assistance from other sources? http://www.duggarfamily.com/contactus.html

Comments

Damn, Alan comes out with the long knives. I salute you, sir.